Bokt.nl

Babootje schreef:

ThreeFingers schreef:

https://www.faz.net/aktuell/gesellschaft/kriminalitaet/fall-maddie-mccann-verdaechtiger-muss-rueckschlag-am-eugh-hinnehmen-16892596.html

TF de link doet het niet

ThreeFingers schreef:

Dit is natuurlijk heel erg lief van je.
Maar met een scooter zou ik zo'n rit niet maken.

Heb je geen vriend of vriendin met een auto, dan kun je er misschien een leuk weekend van maken, en gelijk naar de Ocean club en routes de lopen?

Lusitana schreef:

Voor mij niet. Dus geen idee war het over gaat.

Citaat:

Leonor Cipriano originally said she had been beaten up by several PJ inspectors, but when asked to pick them out of a line-up, she could not. She then changed her story to say that the PJ inspectors ‘must have arranged for a person or persons unknown to come into the police station and beat her’.

-----
Leonor Cipriano had never previously said that Gonçalo Amaral had personally laid a hand on her - until the court hearing in Faro. Indeed, he had ‘only’ been charged with the Portuguese equivalent of ‘criminal malfeasance’ for the alleged actions of men under his command. Yet, in the Faro court, Leonor Cipriano now changed her story once again and said, yes, Amaral had personally hit her after all. However, there was no evidence given to the court that Gonçalo Amaral was even present when she was being questioned.

----

In her original statement, Leonor Cipriano said she knew the time the assaults on her took place because there was a clock on the wall in the room in the police station, and that it was approximately from 6.00pm to 8.00pm. Yet three of the named PJ inspectors accused of torturing her were not even in the building at that time; they did not sign into the police station until 8.00 pm on the day in question.

Leonor Cipriano at one point said that she was forced to kneel on broken glass. But there appears to be no record of damage to her knees or legs that would be consistent with such a serious incident.

A major question mark from Leonor Cipriano’s evidence was to explain how anyone, suffering the kind injuries that Leonor Cipriano now claimed she has suffered (namely being beaten about the body, head and face for two hours), did not suffer additional injuries such as cracked ribs or bruises all over her body, cracked, broken, or knocked-out teeth, a split lip, broken or bloody nose, or bruises below the level of her cheekbones?

----------------
The weakness of the prosecution case was clear from early on in the trial of Gonçalo Amaral and his colleagues.

Evidence was then heard by the court that the Prison Governor of Odemira Prison, where Ms Cipriano was being held, had ordered the Chief Prison Officer to materially alter a report about Leonor Cipriano’s health. Yet, said Mr Carlos Anjos, speaking on behalf of Gonçalo Amaral - it was a ‘stupefying fact’ that [instead of the Prison Governor being on trial] the person on trial for allegedly falsifying a document was António Cardoso, one of the four detectives.
------
However, whatever these injuries might have been, the clear evidence heard by the court was that Leonor Cipriano suffered her main set of injuries between 14 and 18 October whilst she was already in prison.

--------------

Given these examples of lies, contradictions and attempts to falsify documents and cover up certain matters, it was scarcely surprising that some of the four jurors asked a lot of questions of the witnesses during the trial. One interesting statement made by Mr Aragão Correia to the court was that British Police officers had been ‘investigating’ Gonçalo Amaral. But with Aragão Correia’s history of outright lies, fabrications and changes of story, this might well have been yet another fabrication by him. He did not of course give details of their names, ranks, collar numbers or their places of employment. It would be a truly sensational revelation if it could ever be proved that any part of the British security services had actually been used to investigate Gonçalo Amaral with a view to trying to get any ‘dirt’ on him.

-----------------

It was speculated in some quarters that it was just possible that the case against Gonçalo Amaral and his fellow detectives had been brought by Portugal’s equivalent of the Crown Prosecution Service in order to clear Amaral and to prove him innocent. It was thought that the country’s chief prosecutor had a good relationship with the Portuguese Police and perhaps had allowed the case to be brought, perhaps anticipating that Leonor Cipriano’s allegations would be exposed as bogus. But the eventual outcome of the case - Gonçalo Amaral’s conviction for allegedly ‘filing a false report’ (which we shall come to in a moment) - suggests more that this was a political trial wholly intended by the relevant authorities to destroy Gonçalo Amaral’s reputation.

------------

The British press’s response to the trial of Gonçalo Amaral was of no little interest. The facts about Marcos Aragão Correia’s direct links with Método 3 - and thereby to the McCanns - were at least partially uncovered during the hearing, but the British press were silent about it. On the contrary, the alleged misconduct of Gonçalo Amaral was mentioned, alongside endless pictures of Leonor Cipriano with black eyes, clearly linking Mr Amaral to them as the alleged perpetrator or author of the beating she had evidently suffered. So much so, in fact, that many people I have spoken to in England seriously believe that it was Amaral himself who was the one who personally beat up Ms Cipriano. Such is the power of sustained disinformation circulated by the once-respected mass media of Britain.

----------
The trial of Mr Amaral suited the agenda of the McCann Team and their chief public relations adviser, Clarence Mitchell. Right from the early days of the hunt for Madeleine, the McCanns and their advisers had criticised the Portuguese police, first for mounting what they said was an ineffective search for Madeline, and later for wrongly and cruelly accusing them of having been involved in Madeleine’s disappearance. At every opportunity, Clarence Mitchell, the man who had been at the head of the government’s mission to influence the output of the mass media, attacked the Portuguese police in general and Gonçalo Amaral in particular.

Citaat:

LEONOR’S LAWYER RECEIVES MONEY FROM THE MCCANNS
30 October 2008 - by Luís Maneta

Aragão Correia confirms that he was supported with money from Maddie’s parents:

The lawyer claims he is defending Joana’s mother for free and that the McCanns paid him to ‘investigate’ Gonçalo Amaral
-----------
“This doesn’t look like a trial in the Joana case but rather one in the Maddie case”, says a source that is connected to the defence of the former co-rdinator of the PJ in Portimão, who headed the investigations into the disappearance of both children and became a sort of ‘public enemy No. 1’ for the McCann couple.

ThreeFingers schreef:

Absoluut de moeite waard om te kijken!

https://youtu.be/XxaCQJVK3ho

Babootje schreef:

ThreeFingers schreef:

Is er nooit de overweging geweest, dat Amaral corrupt was?
Dat de Mccanns juist onschuldig zijn en door de Portugese politie vals beschuldigd zijn?

Ik heb net ook gelezen, dat ook oa het idee dat Maddie mee gecremeerd is van hem afkomt!
Allemaal speculaties.

Natuurlijk zou het kunnen.

Maar bewezen is dit nooit!

Maar waarom TF? Met wat voor motief? Die man is zo ongeveer alles kwijtgeraakt

Lusitana schreef:

Het heeft te maken met welke pers je wilt geloven, de partijdige, gevoerd door Clarence Mitchell, of de onafhankelijke.

Rondhangen bij de Ocean Club, bij appartementen die fijn bestolen kunnen worden, heeft nog steeds op zich niks te maken met een ontvoering.
En wat je ook over het haar van Brückner wilt zeggen, kaal of gemilimeterd was het niet.
Wel goed dat je de bronvermelding er nu bij doet.

Lusitana schreef:

...
Zelfs waar Amaral helemaal niet bij was, heeft hij nog gedaan.
Zelfs in de zaak Maddie die is afgerond door een ander onder het wakende oog van de Britse politie,
Die een Leicester lab kiest, zodat ze lekker kunnen knoeien en bewijzen vernietigen.
De Britse politie die WEIGERT nieuwe testen er op los te laten. Zelfs als dat theoretisch uit zou kunnen wijzen dat de McCanns inderdaad onschuldig zijn.
...